Summary of Iterations.
Key Points
-
Counter productive to use this site when trying to create communal space when SPH is available
-
Opportunity to regenerate the canal & path way due to its popularity with the residents.
-
Housing is orientated around a singular courtyard
-
Existing commercial buildings remain in order to promote local economy
Key Points
-
Dramatic effect on the site due to tiered landscaping but ultimately, not user friendly.
-
Space at the rear of the site becomes dead space as it not big enough to be used as a communal garden
-
Tree line creates an acoustic barrier against busy Chester Road
-
Singular units offer residents a degree of autonomy
-
Community environment encouraged through position of public and communal spaces
Key Points
-
Opportunity for regeneration of the disused subway
-
Housing is sheltered from Chester Road by communal space
-
Higher density housing & lack of external space could create a disconnected environment
-
Creates a compressive atmosphere on the site
Key Points
-
Modular units allow for maximum flexibility for present & future residents
-
Ample exterior space allows for a greater number of social interactions to occur
-
Site space is not maximised
-
Directly link with SPH & community - residents may not want to be attached to a social institution
Key Points
-
'Cranked' programme creates a variety of privacy levels & more intimate spaces.
-
Maximises site's available space
-
Housing is exposed to Chester Road - issues with privacy & noise
-
Clear boundary line could result in community feeling disconnected from wider Stretford
